HCI Education Survey 1994
Gary Perlman
The Ohio State University
Computer & Information Science
Columbus, Ohio, 43210 USA
perlman@acm.org
|
Jean Gasen
Virginia Commonwealth University
Information Systems Research Institute
Richmond, Virginia, 23284 USA
jgasen@cabell.vcu.edu
|
Notes on the Web Version of the Survey:
This version of the survey is primarily a move from FTP
access on an Ohio State University site to web access
on an ACM server.
When the survey was created, Web use was only beginning,
but now, in 1998, Web access is more prevalent and faster than ftp access.
The files have been moved and relinked,
but the data files are text only,
and still represent a snapshot of the field from 1994.
An updated survey, simply based on links to program Web sites,
is available on the
HCI Education Page.
There is an
online form to submit new information.
The HCI Education Survey contains information about
programs, faculty, and courses with an emphasis on
Human-Computer Interaction.
The goal of the Survey is primarily to provide prospective students
(particularly graduate students) information about educational
opportunities, and secondarily to provide HCI educators information about
other HCI educators.
Unlike some other education surveys, we wanted the HCI Education Survey
to be easily updated and accessed primarily in electronic form.
The cost of printing and mailing the survey and the widespread
availability of electronic mail and personal computers made the
collection and dissemination of an electronic report preferred
over print media.
Before sending out the survey,
we studied other surveys from
The Human Factors Society (1991),
The Software Engineering Institute (1991),
Computer Graphics
(Ferguson, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 23:4, 243-272, 1989),
and a previous survey on HCI
(Mantei & Smelcer, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 16:2, 9-43, 1984).
We developed categories of information we wanted to collect
from people teaching HCI-related courses.
We field-tested the draft survey and made some revisions
and sent the final survey to about 50 known educators in HCI.
Informal communication put us in contact with others.
In 1994, about half the respondents updated their entries via email.
As of early 1996, the following have responded to the survey,
representing:
76 programs, 190 faculty, and 169 courses.
- Univ. of Alabama, Computer Science
- Bowling Green State Univ., Computer Science
- Bond Univ., Information Technology
- Brunel University, Computer Science
- Brigham Young Univ., Computer Science
- Univ. of Calgary, Computer Science
- Univ. of Canberra, Information Sciences & Engineering
- Carnegie Mellon Univ., Computer Science
- Carnegie Mellon Univ., Department of Design
- Univ. of Colorado at Boulder, Computer Science
- Columbia Univ., Computer Science
- Darmstadt Univ., Computer Science (Informatik)
- DePaul Univ., Dept. of CS and IS
- Drexel Univ., Information Studies
- Drexel Univ., Psych/Soc/Anthro
- Georgia Institute of Technology, Computing
- University of Geneva, Psychology and Educational Sciences
- Univ. of Glasgow, Computer Science
- George Mason Univ., Info. & Software Systems Eng.
- George Mason Univ., Psychology
- Georgia State Univ., Math and Computer Science
- Univ. of Guelph, Computing & Information Science
- Univ. of Haifa, Psychology
- Heriot-Watt Univ., Computing and Electrical Engineering
- Linkoping Univ., Computer Science
- Univ. of Liverpool, Computer Science
- Loughborough University, Computer Studies
- Univ. of Maribor, Electrical & Computer Engineering
- Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science
- Univ. of Maryland, Psychology
- Massey Univ., Computer Science
- McGill Univ., Computer Science
- Univ. of Michigan, Computer & Information Systems
- Univ. of Michigan, Elec. Eng. & Computer Science
- Univ. of Minnesota, Computer Science
- MIT, Sloan School of Management
- Moscow State Univ., Psychology
- New Mexico State Univ., Psychology
- Nova SE. Univ., Computer & Info. Sciences
- Ohio State Univ., Industrial & Systems Eng.
- Univ. Oldenburg, Informatics
- Open Univ., Computing
- Univ. of Oregon, Computer and Info. Science
- Univ. of Pittsburgh, Library & Information Science
- Portland State Univ., Computer Science
- Univ. of Portsmouth, Psychology
- Univ. of London, CMW, Dept. of Computer Science
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Computer Science
- Stanford Univ., Computer Science
- Univ. of Sussex, Cognitive & Computing Sciences
- Swinburne Univ. of Technology, Computer Science
- Univ. of Tampere, Computer Science
- Texas A&M Univ., Computer Science
- Univ. of Toronto, Computer Science
- Univ. of Toronto, Ontario Inst. for Studies in Education
- Univ. of Toronto, Library & Information Science
- Technical Univ. of Nova Scotia, Computer Science
- Univ. of California at Irvine, Info. and Computer Science
- University College London, Ergonomics
- Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Info. & Library Sci.
- Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Computer Science & Eng.
- Univ. of New South Wales, Computer Science & Eng.
- Univ. of Southern California, Computer Science
- Univ. of Tennessee at Knoxville, Computer Science
- Univ. of Technology, Sydney, Computer Science
- Univ. of Western Australia, Elec. Engineering
- Univ. West England, Computing
- Virginia Commonwealth Univ., Information Systems
- Univ. of Virginia, Computer Science
- Virginia Tech., Computer Science
- Vrije Univ., Computer Science
- Univ. of Waikato, Computer Science
- Univ. of Washington, Computer Science & Eng.
- Worcester Polytechnic Inst., Computer Science
- Wichita State Univ., Psychology
- Univ. of York, Psychology
The results were checked for consistency and completeness,
and from the data, several reports were developed:
- The Program Report
contains the program contact
person (name, email, phone, and fax), the degrees offered,
the focus, facilities, and faculty (name and email)
for each unit (e.g., school
or department) at each institution.
- The Faculty Report
contains the faculty name,
degree, email and phone, interests and publications
for each faculty at each institution.
- The Course Report
contains the title,
instructor, text and tools used, and course description
for each course taught at each institution.
- Other Reports
include
list of contact names/email
and
list of programs, sorted by region
An update on the survey results appears in the
.B "ACM SIGCHI Bulletin" ,
April 1984, vol. 26:2, pages 8-11.
It summarizes the
countries of programs,
department affiliations,
degrees offered,
number of theses,
course frequency,
books and tools most used in courses,
and most common faculty interests.
To create or modify an entry for an academic unit in the HCI Education Survey,
send a mail message to
chi-educators-request@acm.org.
Detailed instructions and an electronic form will be sent to you.
Please do not submit data without contacting us first.
The Survey results are available on the
World-Wide Web (WWW) and via email.
This document is
available as a WWW page
index.html
with links to the reports and data files.
If you can't access the reports on the web,
we can send the survey results via email.
Send your request for files to:
chi-educators-request@acm.org
Partial support for the Survey was provided by
The Association for Computing Machinery's Special Interest Group on Human
Computer Interaction (ACM SIGCHI).
Additionally, Ohio State University and Virginia Commonwealth University
have provided support for the project.
Finally, the Project gratefully acknowledges the assistance of
Tom Hewett, Gary Strong, and Marilyn Mantei
for their help getting the Survey started,
Terry Winograd and Michelle Wang Baldonado for motivating the WWW version
of this document,
and the encouragement
provided by IFIP WG13.1 on Curricula in Human-Computer Interaction.
We would also like to thank all those individuals who took the time
to respond to our requests for survey data.
Their responses are helping to build a database of HCI Education information
that will be shared around the world.